THEORETICAL PRINCIPLES OF ANTI-CRISIS MANAGEMENT OF FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES OF ENTERPRISES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2023-04-120-127Keywords:
crisis management, foreign economic activity, crisis, management of foreign economic activity of an enterprise, methods of minimization.Abstract
The article reveals the theoretical principles of anti-crisis management of the enterprise's foreign economic activity. The essence of the concept of crisis is revealed. Attention is drawn to the importance of adaptive anti-crisis management aimed at responding to changes and using opportunities to ensure the sustainable development of the enterprise in the conditions of the external environment. The internal and external causes of the crisis are singled out. The classification, tasks, and main principles of anti-crisis management are substantiated. The key elements of managing the foreign economic activity of the enterprise in crisis conditions, as well as the main approaches to minimizing the impact of threats, are considered. Taking into account the importance of developing anti-crisis programs to prevent and overcome crises at the enterprise, the key methods of work to minimize the impact of threats to the enterprise's foreign economic activity were analyzed, such as: minimizing threats through diversification, information search, risk management, interaction with the environment, control of the internal environment. Diversification approaches have been proven to be the most common and effective in protecting foreign economic activity, but require careful, long-term planning and significant financial investment. It is substantiated that obtaining timely information about the state of the market and the industry is an important step toward reducing threats. Attention is drawn to the fact that risk management covers a wider range of actions than crisis management, including identification, analysis, assessment, management, and mitigation of risks that may arise. Emphasis is placed on ensuring the appropriate level of resource reservation, which is aimed at maintaining the necessary stock of cash, raw materials, goods, and other necessary materials. The importance of establishing long-term partnership relations in the implementation of the enterprise's foreign economic activity has been proven. It has been proven that a comprehensive approach to the creation of a system of anti-crisis management of the enterprise's foreign economic activity should include the organization, planning, and implementation of not only specific competencies but also effective management tools that will help the enterprise adapt to changes and increase its competitiveness.
References
Bolotnov D.H. (2022). Osoblyvosti antykryzovoho upravlinnia vitchyznianymy pidpryiemstvamy. [Peculiarities of anti-crisis management of domestic enterprises]. Innovation and Sustainability. No 2. P. 171-176. [in Ukrainian].
Hudz O. Ye. (2019). Formuvannia stratehii antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstv [Formation of the strategy of anti-crisis management of enterprises.]. Ekonomika. Menedzhment. Biznes. no 2. P. 4-10. [in Ukrainian].
Denysiuk O.H. & Derevianko O.Iu. (2015). Sutnist, klasyfikatsiia ta prychyny vynyknennia kryz u diialnosti pidpryiemstv [The essence, classification and causes of crises in the activities of enterprises.]. Visnyk ZhDTU. no 1. P. 80-88. [in Ukrainian].
Dobrovolska O.V. & Lysovska A.M. (2012). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom: sutnist, etapy zdiisnennia ta osnovni antykryzovi zakhody [Anti-crisis management of the enterprise: essence, stages of implementation and main anti-crisis measures]. Ekonomichnyi forum. no 2. P. 288-292. [in Ukrainian].
Iepifanova I. Yu. & Oranska N. O. (2016). Sutnist antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstva [The essence of anti-crisis management of the enterprise]. Ekonomika i suspilstvo. Issue 2. P. 265-269. [in Ukrainian].
Karvatska N.S. (2023). Teoretychni osnovy antykryzovoho upravlinnia zovnishnoekonomichnoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstva [Theoretical foundations of anti-crisis management of the enterprise's foreign economic activity]. Sectoral research XXI: characteristics and features. P. 69-73. [in Ukrainian].
Lihonenko L. O. (2016). Antykryzove upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom v umovakh ekonomiky znan ta intelektualizatsii menedzhmentu [Anti-crisis management of the enterprise in the conditions of the knowledge economy and intellectualization of management]. Ekonomichnyi forum. no 1. P. 161–170. [in Ukrainian].
Lutsyk I.B. & Yurii E.O. (2017). Holovni prychyny vynyknennia kryzovykh yavyshch na pidpryiemstvakh ta mozhlyvi shliakhy yikh podolannia [The main causes of crisis phenomena at enterprises and possible ways to overcome them]. Problemy systemnoho pidkhodu v ekonomitsi. no 2. P. 83-88. [in Ukrainian].
Moskvin B. (2020). Bankrutstvo yak mekhanizm antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Bankruptcy as a mechanism of anti-crisis management of the enterprise]. Visnyk KNTEU. no 2. P. 58–68. [in Ukrainian].
Nemyrovska S.V. (2023). Osoblyvosti upravlinnia zovnishnoekonomichnoiu diialnistiu pidpryiemstva v kryzovykh umovakh [Peculiarities of managing foreign economic activity of the enterprise in crisis conditions]. Visnyk studentskoho naukovoho tovarystva «Vatra». Issue 165. P. 121-127. [in Ukrainian].
Onisiforova V. Yu. & Sidelnikova V. K. (2020). Aktualni aspekty antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvom [Actual aspects of anti-crisis management of the enterprise]. Problemy i perspektyvy rozvytku pidpryiemstva. no 2 (25). P. 137-145. [in Ukrainian].
Podluzhna N.O., Petchenko M.V. & Yakushev O.V. (2020). Vyklyky transformatsii antykryzovoho upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy v suchasnykh umovakh [Challenges of transformation of anti-crisis management of enterprises in modern conditions]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ChDTU. Issue 57. P. 104-109. [in Ukrainian].
Prokopyshyn O.S. (2021). Systema antykryzovoho upravlinnia yak pidgruntia poperedzhennia kryzovykh yavyshch na pidpryiemstvakh [The anti-crisis management system as a basis for the prevention of crisis phenomena at enterprises.]. Ekonomichna nauka. no 9. P. 40-45. [in Ukrainian].
Steshenko O. D. & Masalyhina V. V. (2020). Antykryzove upravlinnia v umovakh pandemii [Anti-crisis management in the conditions of a pandemic]. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti. no 70–71. P. 75-82. [in Ukrainian].
Khomiuk N., Pavlikha N. & Voronyi I. (2020). Dyversyfikatsiia yak instrument zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku silskykh terytorii [Diversification as a tool for sustainable development of rural areas in the context of decentralization]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky. Issue 22. no 96. P. 35–41. [in Ukrainian].
Tsymbaliuk I.O., Pavlikha N.V. & Khomiuk N.L. (2023). Planuvannia diialnosti pidpryiemstv silskoho hospodarstva ta ahropromyslovoho kompleksu: osnovni etapy ta upravlinnia ryzykamy [Planning the activities of agricultural enterprises and agro-industrial complex: key stages and risk management]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky. Issue 25. no 10. P. 38–43. [in Ukrainian].
Shvaiko M. L., Shevchenko Ye. S. & Tymoshenko O. Yu. (2021). Finansovyi mekhanizm zovnishnoekonomichnoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv v umovakh hlobalnoi ekonomichnoi kryzy [The financial mechanism of foreign economic activity of enterprises in the conditions of the global economic crisis]. Ekonomika ta derzhava. no 6. P. 118-123. [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a 