The Social Innovation Introduction Process and Conceptual Approach to Ensure that they Managed Change in Society
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2017-02-45-52Keywords:
innovation, tradition, improvement, interdependence, innovation introduction process, process, phase, control, concept, perspectiveAbstract
Examines the processes occurring in national economy in the modern period in connection with the development of a fundamentally new social institution, namely the welfare state. The arguments about the need to introduce along with market management mechanism updates the source base of its social
immunization. Based on the study of the realities of the social recovery of the developed countries proved that in the conditions of resource limitation of their achievement was the result of harnessing the potential of social innovation. Critically evaluated a range of approaches to engage in scientific and practical usage of the concepts «innovation» and «innovation introduction process». Guided by the developments of foreign scientists and the results of processing the semantic differences slovotsky affixes of the words «innovation» and «innovation introduction process» proposed to qualify the innovation as a result of enhancement of any existing object. It was found that for playback of the past in the present and future applies such a thing as tradition, which is one of the most effective mechanisms of adaptation of human communities to the changing environment through the regulation of institutions and institutions. Proven that innovations occur and are implemented by modernisation tradition. The essence of social innovation introduction process as a process associated with the formation of the construct of appropriate innovations and their implementation in social practice with the achievement of acceptable social result. To provide controlled social innovation introduction process invited to consider this process as a complex construct of the three phases. Under the proposed concept of a managed social innovation introduction process in the first phase are manifested in social institutions that require change; the second is formed a construct of social innovation based on social abnormal deviations from the implemented improvements in the last cycle of social innovation introduction process; the third monitoring (audit) and the determination of the degree of coincidence of the real impact on social change with the project. The specifics of the managed social innovation introduction process is to avoid the «catch-up» type of social innovation that is not able to achieve civilized living standards in the short term, and transition to the strategy of «secured advance» or «from the future». Focuses on the fact that the logic of the process of social innovation introduction process should be such that only from the standpoint of a new, more perfect, in the extent made to change the social architecture of companies.
References
Fedulova, L. (2008). Sotsialni innovatsiyi v sistemi sotsialno-economichnih vidnosin [Social innovation in the social and economic relations]. Retrived from http:// archive.nbuv.gov.ua / portal/soc_gum /usoc/2008_3/60-74.pdf. [in Ukrainian].
Nabatova, O. (2011). Sotsialni innovatsiyi: ponyatie, vidi, subekti [Social innovations: concept, types, subjects]. - Visnik Natsionalnoyi academii imeni Yaroslava Mudrogo, 6, 58-66 [in Russian].
Hapak, N., & Boiko, Ya. (2011). Problemy vprovadzhennia innovatsii na pidpryiemstvakh lehkoi promyslovosti [The problems of innovation in enterprises of light industry]. Proceedings of the Internet Conference’11: naukovo-praktychnoi internet-konferentsii (14–15 december, 2011 hoda). Retrieved from http://conftiapv.at.ua/ publ/konf_ 14_15_grudnja_ 2011 [in Ukrainian].
Lozovickiy, O. (2011). Teorija upravlinnya – osnova rozvitku sistemi suchasnogo derzhavotvorennya v Ukraini [Control theory - the basis of modern state system in Ukraine]. Publichne upravlinnya: teoriya ta praktika - Publichne upravlinnya: teoriya ta praktika, 2, 4-12 [in Ukrainian].
Goshovska, V., & Pashko, L. (2014). Kafedra parlamtntarizmu ta politichnogo menedzhmentu Nacionalnoi academii derzhavnogo upravlinnya pri Prezidentovi Ukraini: misiya ta priorioteti dijalnosti [Department of parliamentarism and political management of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine, mission and priorities]. - Transactions derzhavnoi sluzhbi Ukraini, 1, 15-20 [in Ukrainian].
Krikunenko, D. O. (2011). Problemi vprovadzhennya innovaciy na pidpriemstvah [Problems of innovation in enterprises]. Retrived from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum /Mimi /2011_4_1/1_5.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Tverezovska, N. T., & Sharata, N. G. (2012). Rol innovazii u rozbudovi vishchih navchalnih zakladiv [The role of innovation in the development of higher education]. Retrived from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/pedalm/texts/2012_14/018.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Didchenko, O. I., & Bibochkina, O. J. (2010). Sutnist ta klasifikatsiya innovatsiy [Essence and classification of innovation]. Retrived from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/ en_re /2010_7_5 /26.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Shumpeter, Y. A. (1982). Teriya economicheskogo razvitiya: issledovanie predprinimatelscoy pribili, capitala, credita, protsenta i tsicla conyunkturi [Theory of economic development: the study of entrepreneurial profit, capital, credit, interest and the cycle of the conjuncture], Moskow : Progress [in Russian].
Azgaldov, G. G., & Kostin A. V. (2008). Intelektualnaya sobstvennost, innovatsiyi i kvalimetriya [An intelligent property, innovations and kvalymetryya]. Economigeski strategiyi - Economigeski strategiyi, 2(60), 162-164 [in Russian].
Berdyaev, N. A. (2003). Dukh i realnost [Spirit and Reality]. Moskow : Izdatelstvo AST ; Kharkov : Folio [in Ukrainian].
Arutyunov, S. A. (1989). Narodi i kultura: razvitie i vzaimodeistvie [Peoples and culture: development and interaction]. Moskow : Nauka [in Russian].
Marchall, A. (1993). Printsipi economichescoy nauki [Principles of Economic Science]. Vol. 1, Moskow : Progress [in Russian].