Introduction. The of the electronic system of purchases Prozorro allowed substantially to promote efficiency of public purchases on all levels, though did not decide all problems. One of problems is that customers are oriented on a supply price at the choice of supplier and does not take into account the cost of life cycle. It negatively influences on the cost of the use of commodity and its utilization in the future. In addition, the Ukrainian customers rarely take into account the tendency of increase of part of "green" purchases in the countries of European Union, it can negatively affect structure of our export to the countries EU, where in the nearest years the so-called carbon track will undertake to attention at the commodities imported in EU.

Rezults. Foreign and Ukrainian experts mark the necessity of the use of not only price criterion during realization of tenders but also all spectrum of criteria for the estimation of tender suggestions. In Ukraine a price is a qualificatory criterion for the choice of supplier of commodity(services) from the point of view of budgetary cost effectiveness, but the use of non-price criteria for the estimation of tender suggestions did not yet become widespread practice in Ukraine. At the same time, it can negatively affect actual implementation of obligations under contracts for the supply of goods, works and services, especially in the context of overcoming the consequences of the economic crisis of 2020.

 Conlusions. In order to implement the Association Agreement with the European Union, when conducting tender procurement in Ukraine, special attention should be paid to such a new criterion as the share of "green" energy that will be used in the production of a product. For implementation of Agreement about an association with European Union the special attention it follows to spare to such criterion as part of "green" energy that will be used for the production of that or other commodity during realization of tender purchases in Ukraine. The EU will pay increasing attention to this factor when assessing the environmental friendliness of goods imported into the European Union through evaluation.


1. Kramom V. (2021). Try zakonoproekty zarady ekologii: jak Ukraini daty start zelenym peretvorenniam. [Three bills for the sake of ecology: how to start Ukraine with a green transformation]. URL: [in Ukrainian].

2. Forum Zakupki: obrane. Chastyna 3. Yak zamovnyku vykorystovuvaty v zakupivlyah vartist’ zhyttievoho tsyklu. [Forum Zakupki: selection. Part 3. How the customer to use the value of the life cycle in procurement]. URL:[in Ukrainian].

3. Pro vyznachennyia Prymirnoi metodyky vyznachennia vartosti zhyttjevoho tsyklu tovaru. Nakaz Ministerstva ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva. № 1894 від 28.09.2020 r. [About definition of the Exemplary technique of definition of cost of a life cycle of the goods. Order of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Agriculture]. URL: https:[in Ukrainian].

4. Marchak D., Markuts Yu. (2021). Hamanets na try roky: skilky otrymaie i vytratyt Ukraina do 2024 r. [Wallet for three years: how much will Ukraine receive and spend by 2024.]. URL: https: //[in Ukrainian].

5. Malolitnieva V. (2021). Ekologichnist’ yak perevaha: yak Kyievu zaprovadyty dosvid ES u zelenykh zakupivliakh. [Environmental friendliness as an advantage: how Kyiv can implement the EU experience in green procurement]. URL: [in Ukrainian].

6. Rabinovych M. (2021). Zeleni publichni zakupivli: shodynka do Evropeiskogo Zelenoho kursu. [Green public procurement: a step towards the European Green Course]. URL:[in Ukrainian].

7. Sohatska O. M., Liashenko O. M., Oleiko V. M. [ta in.]. (2016). Netradytsiini ta vidnovliuvalni dzherela energii: otsinka efektyvnosti investytsiinyh proektiv: monografia (2016). Ternopil’, 2016. 308 s. [Unconventional and renewable energy sources: evaluating the effectiveness of investment projects: a monograph] [in Ukrainian].

8. Evrokomisiia predstavyla plan borot’by z klimatychnymy zminamy. (2021). [The European Commission has presented a plan to combat climate change]. URL: [in Ukrainian].

9. Krysovatyi A. (2021). Novyi pragmatyzm fiskalizatsii publichnyh finansiv.[ New pragmatism of fiscalization of public finances]. Svit finansiv,1, p.10-20 [The world of finance] [in Ukrainian].
10. Naukovi dyskusii (2016). [The scientific discussions]. Regionalna ekonomika, 3, p. 142–162 [The regional economy] [in Ukrainian].

11. Miuller V. (2021). Zeleno-zelena dylema. [Green-green dilemma]. Ukrainsky tyzhden,24, p. 20-21 [Ukrainian week] [in Ukrainian].

12. Znyshchennia bioriznomanittia koshtuvatyme svitu 2,7 tryliona dolariv. (2021). [Biodiversity loss will cost the world $ 2.7 trillion]. URL: https:
[in Ukrainian].

13. «Zeleni perehony». Yak Ukraini ne vtratyty dostup do rynku ES. (2021). ["Green" race. How can Ukraine not lose access to the EU market?]. URL:[in Ukrainian].

14. Panchenko V., Reznikova N. (2021). Tsinnist’ strategichnoho forsajtu. [The value of strategic foresight]. Ukrainsky tyzhden, 19, p. 24-27 [Ukrainian week]. [in Ukrainian].

15. Lahtionov I. (2021). «Kupuj amerykans’ke». Yak pratsiuie lokalizatsiia v sviti i shcho ne tak z tsym v Ukraini. ["Buy American." How localization works in the world and what is wrong with it in Ukraine]. URL:[in Ukrainian].