ECOLOGICAL COSTS, THEIR ECONOMIC NATURE AND CONDITION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2019-01-128-137Keywords:
costs, environmental costs, accounting, environmental costs, analysis, ecological tax investment.Abstract
The article considers the economic concept of «environmental costs», various interpretations of his domestic and foreign scientists. The changes of the normative-legal legislation concerning expenses on protection of the environment in the modern conditions are investigated. Conducting an analysis of the costs of protecting the environment. The problems of reflection in the accounting and reporting of environmental costs are investigated.
The purpose of the article. The purpose of the article. Investigation of the essence, content and role of environmental costs in economic activity, studying the state of expenses on environmental protection in Ukraine.
The method (methodology). In this paper we have used the following methods: the method of comparison,method of analysis, method of synthesis, method of abstraction, theoretical method, method of historical and logical generalization. The dialectical method of investigation has become the methodological basis of the research.
Results. The essence of the economic concept «ecological costs» and their reflection on the legislative and normative basis are revealed.
The analysis of expenses on environmental protection at the expense of own funds of enterprises, organizations, institutions by types of environmental measures in actual prices has been carried out.
The dynamics of capital investments on environmental protection and capital repairs of the main means of environmental protection at the expense of own funds of enterprises, organizations and institutions are researched. The dynamics of current expenses for environmental protection at the expense of own funds of enterprises, organizations, institutions and environmental expenditures by sources of financing in 2017 are considered. The problem of displaying environmental costs in accounting and financial reporting is highlighted.
Further research seems appropriate to focus on the location of environmental costs in management accounting.
References
2. Len, V. (2014). Ekolohichni zbytky, vytraty ta vtraty: poniattia, zmist. [Environmental damage, costs and losses: concept, content] Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt. 2, S. 11–18. [in Ukrainian].
3. Kondratiuk, O. M. (2008). Oblik i analiz ekolohichnykh vytrat promyslovykh pidpryiemstv [Облік і аналіз екологічних витрат промислових підприємств]: Dys. … kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.09. K., 260 s. [in Russian].
4. Harmanov, A. V. (2011). Orhanyzatsyia эkonomycheskoho эkolohycheskoho analyza khoziaistvuiushcheho subъekta [Organization of economic ecological analysis of the economic entity]: avtoref. dys. na soyskanye nauchn. stepeny kand. эkon. nauk: spets. 08.00.12 «Bukhhalterskyi uchet, statystyka». Voronezh, 20 s. [in Russian].
5. Zamula, I. V. & Shyhun, M.M. (2009). Analitychna model bukhhalterskoho obliku ekolohichnoi diialnosti [Analytical model of accounting for environmental activities]. Visnyk natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». № 647, S. 337–343. [in Ukrainian].
6. Makar, S. V. (1997). Osnovы эkonomyky pryrodopolzovanyia [Fundamentals of environmental economics] : per. s anhl. Konferentsyia OON po torhovle y razvytyiu : sb. dokladov. M.: Yzd-vo «Fynansы y statystyka», 200 s. [in Russian].
7. Brыlev, A.N. (1983). Puty sovershenstvovanyia ucheta y analyza zatrat na okhranu okruzhaiushchei sredы [Ways to improve accounting and analysis of costs for environmental protection]: avtoref. dyss. na soyskanye uchen. stepeny kand. эkon. nauk. L., 20 s. [in Russian].
8. Maksymiv, L. I. (2005). Tendentsii rozvytku ekolohichno oriientovanoho bukhhalterskoho obliku [Trends in the development of environmentally-oriented accounting]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt : nauk. zhurnal. № 5, S. 18–23. [in Ukrainian].
9. Saenko, K. S. (2005). Uchte эkolohycheskykh zatrat [Accounting for environmental costs] [Tekst]. M.: Fynansы y statystyka, 376 s. [in Russian].
10. Sliusarchuk, R. I. (2003). Klasyfikatsiia ekolohichnykh vytrat i dzherela yikh vynyknennia na derevoobrobnykh pidpryiemstvakh.[ Classification of environmental costs and sources of their occurrence in woodworking enterprises]. Naukovyi visnyk Ukr. DLTU, [13.4], S 234–238. [in Ukrainian].
11. Ekolohichna Konstytutsiia Zemli. Metodolohichni zasady (2011). [Ecological Constitution of the Earth. Methodological foundations.] / Za red. akad. NAN Ukrainy, d-ra ekon. nauk, prof. Yu.Yu. Tunytsi. Lviv: RVV NLTU Ukrainy, 440 s [in Ukrainian].
12. Savchenko, O. F. & Datsii, O.I. & Baida, A. O. & Zyma, H. I. (2015). Ekolohichni vytraty: problemy prava, obliku ta opodatkuvannia. [Environmental costs: problems of law, accounting and taxation]. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 2015 № 5. S. 11–19 [Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhym dostupu: http://www.economy.in.ua/ pdf/5_2015/4.pdf [in Ukrainian].
13. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. (2018). Dovkillia Ukrainy za 2017 rik. [Environment of Ukraine for 2017.]. Za redaktsiieiu O. M. Prokopenko. K:, 225 s. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.ukrstat. gov. ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2018/zb/11/zb_du2017.pdf [in Ukrainian].
14. Hrytsenko O. I. (2016). Ekolohichnyi oblik: vyznachennia perspektyv ta osnovnykh zasad uprovadzhennia. [Environmental accounting: definition of the prospects and the main principles of implementation]. Vypusk # 2 / 2016. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www.economyandsociety.in.ua/journal/2_ukr/121.pdf [in Ukrainian].
15. Bukalo N. A. (2017). Vytraty pidpryiemstva yak ob’iekt upravlinskoho obliku. [Expenses of the enterprise as an object of management accounting]. Visn. Odes. nats. un-tu. Seriia: Ekonomika / Odes. nats. un-t im. I. I. Mechnykova. Odesa, T. 22, № 1[54], S. 166–169. [in Ukrainian].
16. Fatenok-Tkachuk, A. O. &. Blazhenchuk, V. S. Problemy obliku ekolohichnykh vytrat pidpryiemstv. [Problems of accounting of environmental costs of enterprises]. [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhym dostupu: http://www. easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/14_2018/72.pdf [in Ukrainian].