New Criterion of Classification of Blessing: Factors of Placing of their Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2411-4014-2017-01-13-20Keywords:
blessing, factors of placing of production, classification of blessing, resources, technology of production, matrix for classificationAbstract
In an economic theory many going is known near classification of blessing, but yet never blessing was classified after the factors of placing of production (РP), id est by the factors of place in that the free appears blessing or produced blessing economic. In the article it is suggested to classify blessing after the factors of placing of their production by taking into account of properties of technologies of production of blessing, resources that are used in these technologies, contaminations that appear at a production, and also blessing. First, general, division of blessing after factors them РP it is expedient to execute by dividing of blessing into those, РP that predetermined by the dominant pair of factors (blessing of block A general division), and those, РP that predetermined by a few pairs of factors (blessing of block B general division). The identical blessing can be mine-out by means of different technologies and to be characterized the specific factors of РP. 4 groups of types of the economic blessing (TEB) of block are set A, at РP that dominant property is: 1) presence of corresponding source of resource (natural or anthropogenic); 2) closenesses of market of sale; 3) minimum cost of production of blessing; 4) safe distance from large settlements. In the article an offer matrix is for classification of TEB of block В.
References
Menher, K., B’om-Baverk, E., & Vizer, F. (1992). Avstriiskaia shkola v politicheskoi ekonomii [Austrian school of political economy]. Moskva : Ekonomika [in Russian].
Ahrens J. Deepening Integration in an Enlarged EU: A Club-Theoretical Perspective / J. Ahrens, H. W. Hoen, R. Ohr // European Integration. – 2005. – Vol. 27, No. 4. – P. 417–439.
Buchanan J. M. Public Goods in Theory and Practice: A Note on the Minasian-Samuelson Discussion / J. M. Buchanan // Journal of Law and Economics. – 1967. – № 10. – P. 193–197.
Green J. Characterization of Satisfactory Mechanisms of the Revelation of Preferences for Public Goods / J. Green, J. J. Laffont // Econometrica. – 1977. – № 45(2). – P. 427–438.
Hummel J. R. National Goods Versus Public Goods: Defense, Disarmament and Free Riders / J. R. Hummel // Review of Austrian Economics. –1990. – № 4. – P. 88–122.
Jensen R. Giffen Behavior and Subsistence Consumption / R. Jensen, N. Miller // American Economic Review. – 2008. – № 97 (4). – P. 1553–1577.
Samuelson P. A. Contrast Between Welfare Conditions for Joint Supply and for Public Goods / P. A. Samuelson // The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1969. – № 51(1). – P. 26–30.
Veblen, T. (1984). Teoriia prazdnoho klassa [Theory of the idle class]. Moskva : Prohress [in Russian].
Stihlits, Dzh. E. (1998). Ekonomika derzhavnoho sektora [Economics of the Public Sector]. Kyiv : Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
Chubukova, O. Yu., & Synenko, O. I. (2010). Mistse i rol’ derzhavy na suchasnomu etapi rozvytku ekonomiky Ukrainy [The place and role of the state at the current stage of development of Ukraine's economy]. Aktual’ni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of economics, 8 (110), 79–88 [in Ukrainian].
Stadnyts’kyi, Yu. I., & Komarnyts’kyi, I. M. (2010). Prostorova orhanizatsiia sotsial’no-ekonomichnykh system [The spatial organization of socio-economic systems]. L’viv : Apriori [in Ukrainian].
Stadnyts’kyi, Yu. I., & Komarnyts’kyi, I. M. (2010). Prostorolohiia [Prostorolohiya]. L’viv : Apriori [in Ukrainian].
This work is licensed under a 