DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR MANAGING FINANCIAL FLOWS AND STUDENT MOTIVATION IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2026-01-46-55

Keywords:

digital platforms, higher education, financial flows, online payments, gamification, student motivation, digitalization, digital university.

Abstract

Introduction. Research into digital platforms for managing financial flows and student motivation in the higher education system is an important task for modern economic science, considering the deepening digital transformation of universities, the growing role of human capital, the spread of blended learning formats, and increasing demands for transparency and efficient use of resources. In such conditions, the digital student account and integrated payment and motivation modules cease to be auxiliary services and become institutional tools that influence payment discipline, revenue structure, transaction costs, and behavioral parameters of educational activity.

Aim. The aim of the article is to provide a comprehensive economic analysis of digital platforms as tools for managing financial flows and student motivation in the higher education system, as well as to identify the key determinants of their effectiveness using the example of the integrated EUni student account solution in web and mobile formats.

Methods. The methodological basis of the research is the theoretical provisions of the digital transformation economy and the platform economy, as well as scientific approaches to assessing operational efficiency and transaction costs. To solve the research problems, conceptual and logical analysis, systems and interdisciplinary approaches were used, which made it possible to combine the economic interpretation of financial processes with the behavioral aspects of student motivation in a digital environment. Functional and structural analysis of the payment and motivation modules of the student account was applied, as well as elements of institutional analysis to substantiate the role of standardization of procedures, transparency of transactions, and rules of the internal bonus system.

Results. As a result of the study, the economic role of the platform approach in higher education was substantiated as a mechanism for improving the manageability of financial flows and forming behavioral incentives for students within a unified digital environment. It was determined that the key determinants of effectiveness are the standardization of payment procedures and digital accounting of obligations, transparency of transactions and control of payment statuses, integration of financial services with motivational mechanisms, as well as the formation of internal digital economies based on bonus currency and an internal store. It has been shown that the integration of online payment and gamification modules in the EUni student account creates organizational and economic prerequisites for reducing administrative costs, improving payment discipline, and enhancing student engagement.

Conclusions. Revealing the economic determinants of the effectiveness of digital platforms for managing financial flows and student motivation allows us to specify the requirements for the university’s platform architecture, clarify the mechanisms of influence of integrated payment and motivation modules on operational efficiency and behavioral parameters of educational activity, and outline directions for further verification of the effects of internal digital economies and the sustainability of incentives in the long term

References

1. Verina, N., & Titko, J. (2019). Digital transformation: Conceptual framework. In Contemporary Issues in Business, Management and Economics Engineering (pp. 719–727). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3846/cibmee.2019.073

2. Bobro, N. (2024). Digital technologies in the context of economic systems development. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 12(2), 64–70. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/842

3. Kaku, M. (2019). Robots, artificial intelligence, and the future of work. In Environmental Health and the US Federal System: Sustainably Managing Health Hazards (p. 254).

4. Gassmann, O., Frankenberger, K., Sauer, R., Blohm, I., & Palmié, M. (2025). Exploring the field of business innovation: New theoretical perspectives. Springer Nature. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-03104-4

5. Boemelburg, R., Schuhmacher, A., & Gassmann, O. (2025). The impact of open innovation practices on explorative and exploitative performance of new products. Academy of Management Proceedings. Valhalla, NY: Academy of Management, p. 12925. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2025.12925abstract

6. Gassmann, O., & Wincent, J. (2025). The non-human enterprise: How AI agents reshape organizations. California Management Review Insights, October 22, 1–12.

7. Lysenko, S., Bobro, N., Korsunova, K., Vasylchyshyn, O., & Tatarchenko, Y. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in cybersecurity: Automation of protection and detection of threats. Economic Affairs, 69(Special Issue), 43–51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46852/0424-2513.1.2024.6

8. Khomenko, O. O., Paustovska, M. V., & Onyshchuk, I. A. (2024). Vplyv interaktyvnykh tekhnolohii na protses navchannia i rozvytok zdobuvachiv vyshchoi osvity [Impact of interactive technologies on the learning process and development of higher education students]. Naukovi innovatsii ta peredovi tekhnolohii, 5(33), 1222–1231. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2024-5(33)-1222-1231 [in Ukrainian].

9. Lan, H., Zhang, Y., & Liu, W. (2024). Assessing the digital competence of in-service university educators. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 11245–11263. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-2

10. Williamson, B., Eynon, R., & Potter, J. (2020). Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: Digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(2), 107–114. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641

11. Kortemeyer, G., Dittmann-Domenichini, N., & Merki, C. (2025). Attending lectures in person, hybrid or online at a technical university: How do students choose after the pandemic, and what about the outcome? Discover Education, 4(1), 94. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00500-y

12. Kubiv, S. I., Bobro, N. S., Lopushnyak, G. S., Lenher, Y. I., & Kozhyna, A. (2020). Innovative potential in European countries: Analytical and legal aspects. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(2), 250–264. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.35808/ijeba/457

13. Visual Capitalist. (2025). Visualized: The growth of global internet users (1990–2025). Retrieved from https://www.visualcapitalist.com/visualized-the-growth-of-global-internet-users-1990-2025/

14. World Bank. (2025). Government expenditure on education, total (% of GDP). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.XPD.TOTL.GD.ZS

15. ETH Zurich. (2026). Semester invoice – Student portal. Retrieved from https://ethz.ch/students/en/studies/financial/semester-invoices.html

16. University of Leicester. (2026). UPAY rewards: Food and drink. Retrieved from https://le.ac.uk/food-drink/rewards

17. Transact Campus. (2026). Transact mobile ordering – Integration for higher education. Retrieved from https://www.transactcampus.com/solutions/campus-commerce/transact-mobile-ordering

Downloads

Published

2026-03-29

How to Cite

[1]
Bobro, N. 2026. DIGITAL PLATFORMS FOR MANAGING FINANCIAL FLOWS AND STUDENT MOTIVATION IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. Economic journal of Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University. 1, 45 (Mar. 2026), 46–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.29038/2786-4618-2026-01-46-55.